Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tao Of Freedom's avatar

The concept of "free trade" was/is camouflage for the use of modern day slavery as labour trapped in oppressive regimes has no choice but to work for a bowl of rice a day.

Western capitalists sought to increase their profit margins via the bypassing of the cost of labour in their far free-er nations.

Western consumers bought effectively stolen goods in the sense that these goods are contaminated by the theft of labour, the difference in wages that a modern day slave secured versus that of their Western equivalent.

That difference is the stolen component, and that difference is the amount that should be confiscated in every sale and held in trust for reparations directly to the slaves.

Not tariffs, but reparations.

For a slave who faces being crushed by a tank, even when we apply the Harm Consent Rule of Trevor Watkins coupled to the "Nature of Us", the NoU, we do have harm without consent because the slave willing to work for that bowl of rice does not have the freedom of choice that a worker in a freer-er society would have.

Be it a tank about to crush you or the threat of having your organs harvested for dissent is not free choice wherein HCR x NoU is not violated.

For the NoU see: https://thetaooffreedom.substack.com/p/the-nature-of-us-nou?utm_source=publication-search

No posts

Ready for more?