Stability and safety do not always coincide. Mature regulatory systems often optimize for defensibility—career safety for the individual regulator—rather than for minimizing total harm to the public.
In a genuine free market competing systems of safety and security would arise and consumers and employees could choose which ones they wish to embrace, via Trevor Watkins' Harm Consent Rule.
A genuine free market however can only be the manifestation of a society within which the Harm Consent Rule, the HCR, coupled to the "Nature of Us", the NoU prevails.
This formula defines violence (initiation of physical harm to others) explicitly.
The NoU is the appropriate source of ethics and morality, our Nature as an evolved collective of a myriad instances, past, present and probable future, scientifically sampled as an inventory of our attributes, ranked in a real world order of significance.
(Ayn Rand's "Nature of Man", her NoM, based on her Aristotelian ideas, sets the precedent but in itself it is flawed as it is skewed towards egoism as the moral metric).
I haven’t read her nature of man, but was very impressed by the way she argued her essay” the objectivist ethics”. I will definite try and find the nature of man work
In a genuine free market competing systems of safety and security would arise and consumers and employees could choose which ones they wish to embrace, via Trevor Watkins' Harm Consent Rule.
A genuine free market however can only be the manifestation of a society within which the Harm Consent Rule, the HCR, coupled to the "Nature of Us", the NoU prevails.
This formula defines violence (initiation of physical harm to others) explicitly.
The NoU is the appropriate source of ethics and morality, our Nature as an evolved collective of a myriad instances, past, present and probable future, scientifically sampled as an inventory of our attributes, ranked in a real world order of significance.
For the NoU see: https://thetaooffreedom.substack.com/p/the-nature-of-us-nou?utm_source=publication-search
(Ayn Rand's "Nature of Man", her NoM, based on her Aristotelian ideas, sets the precedent but in itself it is flawed as it is skewed towards egoism as the moral metric).
I haven’t read her nature of man, but was very impressed by the way she argued her essay” the objectivist ethics”. I will definite try and find the nature of man work